Newport Beach
Newport Beach
Los Angeles
Las Vegas
San Diego
Walnut Creek
Phoenix
Reno
Riverside
Denver
North San Diego
Dallas
(949)221-1000 (949)221-1001 20320 S.W. Birch Street Second Floor, Newport Beach CA 92660
(818)712-9800 (818)712-9900 21215 Burbank Blvd. Suite 500, Woodland Hills CA 91367
(702)258-6665 (702)258-6662 1160 N Town Center Dr Suite 250, Las Vegas NV 89144
(619)236-0048 (619)236-0047 501 West Broadway Suite 1700, San Diego CA 92101
(510)540-4881 (510)540-4889 2033 N. Main St. Suite 600, Walnut Creek, Ca 94596
(602)274-1204 (602)274-1205 8950 South 52nd St Suite 201, Tempe AZ 85284
(775)440-2389 (775) 440-2390 50 West Liberty Suite 1090, Reno NV 89501
(951)276-9020 (951)276-9022 5225 Canyon Crest Dr. Suite 71-363, Riverside CA 92507
(720) 779-2500 (303)256-6205 1999 Broadway, Suite 3250, Denver, Colorado 80202
(760)557-2940 (619)389-2993 760 Garden View Ct. Unit #100 Encinitas, CA 92024
(949) 221-1000 (949) 221-1001 1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 2000 Dallas, Texas 75201

Congratulations to Las Vegas Partner Jeffrey W. Saab on a Huge Win in Federal Court!

The underlying litigation arose from a UM claim stemming from a hit and run accident in which Plaintiff alleged she sustained serious injury as a result of same. A settlement was reached pre-litigation and was made contingent on a release of all claims and included confidentiality and non-disparagement as to Plaintiff.  After Plaintiff’s counsel confirmed the settlement, he asserted that conditioning same on the execution of a release was in violation of Nevada law, a common position of the Plaintiffs’ bar in Clark County, Nevada. Plaintiff’s counsel ultimately had his client execute the release in exchange for the settlement check. However later, he filed a Complaint in District Court which alleged: (i) breach of contract; (2) bad faith; and (3) breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Plaintiff sought damages in excess of $1,000,000.00.

BWB&O Partner Jeffrey Saab removed the lawsuit to Federal Court and sought dismissal of Plaintiff’s Complaint by virtue of a Motion for Summary Judgment in which he argued that the underlying settlement encompassed all claims including bad faith and breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing; the language of the release was clear and unambiguous; and that conditioning the settlement on the execution of a release was in conformance with Nevada Law.

After consideration of the moving papers, the Court granted Jeffrey’s Motion for Summary Judgment ruling, in pertinent part, that conditioning the settlement on the execution of a release by Plaintiff did not violate the Nevada Administrative Code Section 686A.660; that the scope of the release was not overbroad; and that no additional consideration was required beyond the original settlement paid to support the scope of the release.

Following issuance of the Order, the Court entered judgment in favor of Jeffrey’s client and dismissed the case in its entirety.