Newport Beach
Newport Beach
Los Angeles
Las Vegas
San Diego
Oakland
Phoenix
Reno
Riverside
Denver
North San Diego
(949)221-1000 (949)221-1001 20320 S.W. Birch Street Second Floor, Newport Beach CA 92660
(818)712-9800 (818)712-9900 21215 Burbank Blvd. Suite 500, Woodland Hills CA 91367
(702)258-6665 (702)258-6662 1160 N Town Center Dr Suite 250, Las Vegas NV 89144
(619)236-0048 (619)236-0047 501 West Broadway Suite 1700, San Diego CA 92101
(510)540-4881 (510)540-4889 300 Frank H Ogawa Plaza Suite 355, Oakland CA 94612
(602)274-1204 (602)274-1205 8950 South 52nd St Suite 201, Tempe AZ 85284
(775)440-2389 (775) 440-2390 50 West Liberty Suite 1090, Reno NV 89501
(951)276-9020 (951)276-9022 5225 Canyon Crest Dr. Suite 71-363, Riverside CA 92507
(720) 779-2500 (303)256-6205 1675 Broadway, Suite 1850, Denver CO 80202
(760)557-2940 (619)389-2993 760 Garden View Ct. Unit #100 Encinitas, CA 92024

Partner August Hotchkin And Associate andrew Bunn Successfully Prevail On Summary Judgment In Reno, Nevada!

Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara, LLP was retained to defend a Utah oilfield services company that was sued in Nevada for an alleged negligent breach of an oil well casing in an oil well located in Utah. The plaintiff is a Nevada company with interest in the well that sought over $4 million in damages. The matter was previously litigated in Utah where the Utah court determined that the plaintiff-company and individual with interest in the well could not prove their claim against the oilfield services company, dismissing their claims with prejudice. BWB&O’s client also prevailed via a motion for verdict and obtained a judgment against the plaintiff-company. Not happy with the developments during the Utah case, the plaintiff-company in Utah transferred some of its interest to another company in Nevada that was owned/managed by the same people involved in the Utah matter. After conclusion of the Utah case, the Nevada company filed suit against BWB&O’s client in the Second Judicial District Court, State of Nevada, County of Washoe.

After responding to the complaint and obtaining sufficient evidence, BWB&O filed a motion for summary judgment with the Nevada Court and Partner August Hotchkin successfully argued that nonmutual claim preclusion applied wherein collateral estoppel and res judicata barred the Nevada company from trying to take a second bite of the apple to avoid the Utah defense judgment. The court agreed with BWB&O that the Nevada company’s interests were adequately represented in the Utah matter because the same issues were already litigated and adjudicated there and, consequently, the Nevada company was in privity with the Utah plaintiffs. The court also agreed with BWB&O’s argument that the Nevada company was barred by Utah’s statute of limitations because Utah had the most significant relationship with the issues and allegations regarding the oil well and the Nevada company could not bypass it through forum-shopping. The judge agreed that BWB&O’s client was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law on all issues.

This is a huge victory given that summary judgments are rarely granted in Nevada. Congratulations to the Reno team!