Newport Beach
Newport Beach
Los Angeles
Las Vegas
San Diego
Walnut Creek
Arizona
Reno
Denver
North San Diego
Dallas
(949)221-1000 (949)221-1001 402 W Broadway Suite 2300, San Diego, CA 92101
(818)712-9800 (818)712-9900 21215 Burbank Blvd. Suite 500, Woodland Hills CA 91367
(702)258-6665 (702)258-6662 1160 N Town Center Dr Suite 250, Las Vegas NV 89144
(619)236-0048 (619)236-0047 402 W Broadway Suite 2300, San Diego, CA 92101
(510)540-4881 (510)540-4889 2033 N. Main St. Suite 600, Walnut Creek, Ca 94596
(602)274-1204 (602)274-1205 2525 West Frye Rd Suite 200 Chandler, AZ 85224
(775)440-2389 (775) 440-2390 50 West Liberty Suite 1090, Reno NV 89501
(720) 779-2500 (303)256-6205 1999 Broadway, Suite 3250, Denver, Colorado 80202
(760)557-2940 (619)389-2993 760 Garden View Ct. Unit #220 Encinitas, CA 92024
(949) 221-1000 (949) 221-1001 1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 2000 Dallas, Texas 75201

Motion for Summary Judgment Granted in Significant California Public Utilities Suit

Congratulations to Partner Mike D’Andrea and Associates Ruth Rasiah and Kaylah Abdullah in the Los Angeles office for obtaining a complete dismissal of their clients in a significant claim involving California’s Public Utilities regulations.
 
After lengthy litigation, BWB&O’s Motion for Summary Judgment was granted against Claimant, Spectrum (Charter Communications), which resulted in a complete dismissal of the action against BWB&O’s clients. At issue was whether California’s Public Utilities Code shifted the common law duty to maintain certain utility equipment in residential areas within Southern California. After significant briefing, the Superior Court found that BWB&O correctly argued that the Public Utilities Code required utility companies, like Spectrum, to fully maintain utility equipment, and that private residents are not responsible for utility maintenance (even if the physical equipment is located on private property).
 
This is a significant win for homeowners in Southern California, as the Court disagreed with Spectrum’s interpretation of the Public Utilities Code (which allowed utilities to attempt to shift the risk of lack of maintenance to private residents). BWB&O’s clients, two private homeowners, were facing significant damages in the suit due to alleged improper utility equipment maintenance. This is an important victory for private homeowners against large public utility companies that attempt to avoid responsibility for utility equipment failures.