Newport Beach
Newport Beach
Los Angeles
Las Vegas
San Diego
Walnut Creek
North San Diego
(949)221-1000 (949)221-1001 20320 S.W. Birch Street Second Floor, Newport Beach CA 92660
(818)712-9800 (818)712-9900 21215 Burbank Blvd. Suite 500, Woodland Hills CA 91367
(702)258-6665 (702)258-6662 1160 N Town Center Dr Suite 250, Las Vegas NV 89144
(619)236-0048 (619)236-0047 501 West Broadway Suite 1700, San Diego CA 92101
(510)540-4881 (510)540-4889 2033 N. Main St. Suite 600, Walnut Creek, Ca 94596
(602)274-1204 (602)274-1205 8950 South 52nd St Suite 201, Tempe AZ 85284
(775)440-2389 (775) 440-2390 50 West Liberty Suite 1090, Reno NV 89501
(720) 779-2500 (303)256-6205 1999 Broadway, Suite 3250, Denver, Colorado 80202
(760)557-2940 (619)389-2993 760 Garden View Ct. Unit #220 Encinitas, CA 92024
(949) 221-1000 (949) 221-1001 1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 2000 Dallas, Texas 75201

BWB&O’s Woodland Hills Team Achieves a Fantastic Result in a Highly Contentious Dispute

Congratulations to Partner, Patrick Au and Associate, Patrick Malone of the Woodland Hills office on achieving a fantastic result in a highly contentious dispute involving allegations of assault and battery against a Las Vegas Hotel, casino operator and individual security personnel. Plaintiff suffered a torn rotator cuff which required surgery and multiple lesser injuries. In all, he alleged approximately $200,000.00 in medical special damages and another $60,000.00 in loss of earnings. Plaintiff also alleged that he was entitled to significant general damages and punitive damages on the basis of the alleged conduct of the defendants being particularly egregious.

Over the life of the lawsuit, Mr. Au and Mr. Malone, successfully rebutted all of Plaintiff’s liability and damages arguments in an effort to minimize Plaintiff’s expectations in regard to the potential value of this case and to prepare for trial, which seemed likely throughout based on the contentious nature of the dispute. Although not directly employed by the client, Plaintiff had been trying to impose liability on our client on the basis of an agency and/or special employee relationship with the security personnel involved. While working with their co-defendants to ensure a staunch defense against Plaintiff’s allegations generally, Mr. Au and Mr. Malone focused on systematically dismantling each element of these arguments that Plaintiff set forth in regard to the connection between the security personnel and the client.

In a last ditch effort to resolve this matter prior to trial, the parties agreed to mediate. In advance, Plaintiff set forth a global demand of $1,800,000.00.  Mr. Au and Mr. Malone spent the majority of the time convincing the mediator of their ability to prevail on the liability issues in the case and that Plaintiff needed to be reasonable in order to avoid the very real potential of a defense verdict. Despite the exorbitant demand, it appeared that the months of persuasive efforts had convinced Plaintiff of the strength of the client’s position and Plaintiff ultimately settled with the client for only $55,000.00.  The matter has now globally resolved and suffice to say, both the carrier and the client are very pleased with this result.