Newport Beach
Newport Beach
Los Angeles
Las Vegas
San Diego
Walnut Creek
North San Diego
(949)221-1000 (949)221-1001 20320 S.W. Birch Street Second Floor, Newport Beach CA 92660
(818)712-9800 (818)712-9900 21215 Burbank Blvd. Suite 500, Woodland Hills CA 91367
(702)258-6665 (702)258-6662 1160 N Town Center Dr Suite 250, Las Vegas NV 89144
(619)236-0048 (619)236-0047 501 West Broadway Suite 1700, San Diego CA 92101
(510)540-4881 (510)540-4889 2033 N. Main St. Suite 600, Walnut Creek, Ca 94596
(602)274-1204 (602)274-1205 8950 South 52nd St Suite 201, Tempe AZ 85284
(775)440-2389 (775) 440-2390 50 West Liberty Suite 1090, Reno NV 89501
(720) 779-2500 (303)256-6205 1999 Broadway, Suite 3250, Denver, Colorado 80202
(760)557-2940 (619)389-2993 760 Garden View Ct. Unit #220 Encinitas, CA 92024
(949) 221-1000 (949) 221-1001 1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 2000 Dallas, Texas 75201

Las Vegas Partners Jared Christensen and Madeline Arcellana Obtain Excellent Trial Verdict!

Congratulations to Las Vegas Partners, Jared Christensen and Madeline Arcellana, on completing a 10-day trial, which resulted in a unanimous jury verdict that adopted the Defendant’s proposed award.

BWB&O’s client was an individual dog owner, which undisputedly bit Plaintiff, a pedestrian on a public sidewalk. Defendant did not deny that his dog had bitten Plaintiff. The dispute at trial focused on two main issues: (1) the specific circumstances that led to the bite; and (2) the severity of the actual damage caused by the minor bite. Specifically, Plaintiff claimed that the bite caused a traumatic shoulder injury requiring surgery a year after the incident.

The incident occurred in October 2014, and had been in litigation since October 2016, including going through Nevada’s mandatory non-binding arbitration program, where Ms. Arcellana obtained a full defense verdict in October 2017. Clearly dissatisfied with this outcome, Plaintiff sought a trial de novo in the Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada. At the conclusion of the 10-day jury trial, Plaintiff sought an award of $405,000.00, inclusive of both past and future general damages, despite the fact that she had not sought any medical care since January 2016. During closing argument, Ms. Arcellana argued that should the jury find Defendant was negligent, that a more modest award would be appropriate – commensurate with the minimal nature of the bite itself. The jury ultimately adopted Ms. Arcellana’s recommendation and awarded Plaintiff just $7,000.00 for her damages, well below Defendant’s Offer of Judgment served in 2017.