Newport Beach
Newport Beach
Los Angeles
Las Vegas
San Diego
Walnut Creek
North San Diego
(949)221-1000 (949)221-1001 20320 S.W. Birch Street Second Floor, Newport Beach CA 92660
(818)712-9800 (818)712-9900 21215 Burbank Blvd. Suite 500, Woodland Hills CA 91367
(702)258-6665 (702)258-6662 1160 N Town Center Dr Suite 250, Las Vegas NV 89144
(619)236-0048 (619)236-0047 501 West Broadway Suite 1700, San Diego CA 92101
(510)540-4881 (510)540-4889 2033 N. Main St. Suite 600, Walnut Creek, Ca 94596
(602)274-1204 (602)274-1205 8950 South 52nd St Suite 201, Tempe AZ 85284
(775)440-2389 (775) 440-2390 50 West Liberty Suite 1090, Reno NV 89501
(720) 779-2500 (303)256-6205 1999 Broadway, Suite 3250, Denver, Colorado 80202
(760)557-2940 (619)389-2993 760 Garden View Ct. Unit #220 Encinitas, CA 92024
(949) 221-1000 (949) 221-1001 1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 2000 Dallas, Texas 75201

Tyler Offenhauser – Arbitration Result

On December 9, Tyler Offenhauser from our Newport Beach office, obtained an Arbitration Award in favor of subcontractors in an arbitrated case regarding interpretation of an indemnity agreement. After 70 days of arbitration, the Arbitrator made rulings as to fault for construction defects for both the General Contractor as it relates to the Owner, and the subcontractors as they relate to the General Contractor. After this ruling, the General Contractor filed briefing in order to enforce their “Type I” indemnity provision against the subcontractors such that the subcontractors would be responsible both for the fault allocated to them as well as the fault allocated specifically to the General Contractor.

Even though the subcontract states “It is the intention of the parties that Subcontractor is providing a Type I indemnity under California law,” the Arbitrator ruled that the indemnity agreement was actually a Type III, and therefore the General Contractor cannot pass the portion of the award allocated to them to the subcontractors.  The Arbitrator found that under  the California Civil Code Section 2782 and the two major interpretations of contractual indemnity related to construction cases, Centex Golden Const. Co. v. Dale Tile Co. and Heppler v. J.M. Peters Co., Type I indemnity that would cause a party to owe indemnity on someone else’s negligence must be explicitly written into the contract terms.  In our case, even though the subcontracts stated explicitly that the agreement was Type I, the contract did not include the explicit markings of Type I indemnity, and therefore could not be interpreted to force subcontractors to pay for the negligence that the Arbitrator directly allocated to the General Contractor.

Leave a Reply