Newport Beach
Newport Beach
Los Angeles
Las Vegas
San Diego
Walnut Creek
North San Diego
(949)221-1000 (949)221-1001 20320 S.W. Birch Street Second Floor, Newport Beach CA 92660
(818)712-9800 (818)712-9900 21215 Burbank Blvd. Suite 500, Woodland Hills CA 91367
(702)258-6665 (702)258-6662 1160 N Town Center Dr Suite 250, Las Vegas NV 89144
(619)236-0048 (619)236-0047 501 West Broadway Suite 1700, San Diego CA 92101
(510)540-4881 (510)540-4889 2033 N. Main St. Suite 600, Walnut Creek, Ca 94596
(602)274-1204 (602)274-1205 8950 South 52nd St Suite 201, Tempe AZ 85284
(775)440-2389 (775) 440-2390 50 West Liberty Suite 1090, Reno NV 89501
(720) 779-2500 (303)256-6205 1999 Broadway, Suite 3250, Denver, Colorado 80202
(760)557-2940 (619)389-2993 760 Garden View Ct. Unit #220 Encinitas, CA 92024
(949) 221-1000 (949) 221-1001 1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 2000 Dallas, Texas 75201

BWB&O’s Denver Partner Devin Brunson and Senior Associate Gabriel Montalvo Secure an Appellate Victory

Congratulations to Denver Partner Devin S. Brunson and Senior Associate Gabriel Montalvo for successfully defending a complex matter involving statute of limitations, relation back, misapplication of law, and improper prosecution of claims for relief on appeal with the Colorado Court of Appeals!

Plaintiff’s lawsuit was initially filed directly against BWB&O’s client’s insurer to preserve the statute of limitations as a direct action seeking relief based upon contractual benefits stemming from a motor vehicle accident. Subsequently, after realizing direct actions are not permitted against third-party carriers in Colorado, Plaintiff amended her complaint to assert a standard negligence cause of action against our client after the statute of limitations had already tolled. After briefing on our granted motion to dismiss and plaintiff’s denied motion to reconsider, the trial court awarded attorneys’ fees and costs.

Plaintiff thereafter appealed to the Colorado Court of Appeals arguing that the trial court misapplied the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure and applicable legal authority regarding amending complaints after the statute of limitations has tolled. Through briefing, Mr. Brunson and Mr. Montalvo were able to make a substantial argument supporting their client’s position that there was no mistake in Plaintiff’s actions pursuing a direct action against their client’s insurer thereby precluding Plaintiff’s ability to pursue the negligence claim against their client.

After closure of briefing, the Colorado Court of Appeals Ordered Oral Argument on the issues at which Devin and Gabriel successfully and convincingly argued that there were no mistakes by Plaintiff, that Plaintiff’s intent and motive at all times were to pursue a direct action against their client’s insurer, and that there did not exist any form of relation back permitting Plaintiff to pursue a claim of negligence against their client. After Oral Argument, the Court of Appeals issued an Opinion ruling in favor of Defendant on all matters on appeal, and due to Plaintiff’s failure to appeal the trial court’s award of attorneys’ fees and costs, the Court of Appeals also upheld the trial court’s award.