Newport Beach
Newport Beach
Los Angeles
Las Vegas
San Diego
Walnut Creek
Phoenix
Reno
Denver
North San Diego
Dallas
(949)221-1000 (949)221-1001 20320 S.W. Birch Street Second Floor, Newport Beach CA 92660
(818)712-9800 (818)712-9900 21215 Burbank Blvd. Suite 500, Woodland Hills CA 91367
(702)258-6665 (702)258-6662 1160 N Town Center Dr Suite 250, Las Vegas NV 89144
(619)236-0048 (619)236-0047 501 West Broadway Suite 1700, San Diego CA 92101
(510)540-4881 (510)540-4889 2033 N. Main St. Suite 600, Walnut Creek, Ca 94596
(602)274-1204 (602)274-1205 8950 South 52nd St Suite 201, Tempe AZ 85284
(775)440-2389 (775) 440-2390 50 West Liberty Suite 1090, Reno NV 89501
(720) 779-2500 (303)256-6205 1999 Broadway, Suite 3250, Denver, Colorado 80202
(760)557-2940 (619)389-2993 760 Garden View Ct. Unit #220 Encinitas, CA 92024
(949) 221-1000 (949) 221-1001 1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 2000 Dallas, Texas 75201

Congratulations to Arizona Partner John Belanger and Associate Ryan Leibel on a Successful Motion for Summary Judgment!

Bremer Whyte Brown & O’Meara is excited to share that Arizona Partner John Belanger and Associate Ryan Leibel recently prevailed on a Motion for Summary Judgment.

The case stemmed from an alleged incident on the premises of BWB&O’s client, a large wholesale retailer.  Specifically, Plaintiff allegedly slipped on water causing her to fall forward onto the handlebars of her shopping cart. Plaintiff sued BWB&O’s client for negligence under a theory of premises liability, alleging the water was an unreasonably dangerous condition that BWB&O’s client should have discovered and remedied. Plaintiff alleged serious upper and lower extremity injuries resulting from the incident. Following targeted discovery, John and Ryan filed a Motion for Summary Judgment seeking dismissal of the claims against BWB&O’s client.  The motion argued that there was no evidence on which a reasonable jury could conclude that BWB&O’s client was on notice of the water prior to the incident and, because surveillance cameras captured the incident but did not show the source of the water, that a jury would be left to speculate as to how long the water was on the floor before the incident.  The Court agreed and ruled that BWB&O’s client was entitled to judgment as a matter law. Well done, John and Ryan! We are thrilled with this result.